Wednesday, October 20, 2010

Anti-Federalism - Tea Party Movement

Dr. Korfhage mentioned in class a similarity that I found quite interesting. The Anti-Federalist movement of the late 18th century held many beliefs similar to those of the Tea Party movement which just appeared in 2009. The most basic comparison to be made between the two movements is a desire to weaken the central government of the United States. I believe this comparison can reveal a lot about the current state of our country as compared to its state in the decades preceding the revolutionary war. We live in a turbulent time in our nation's history,  and the media certainly has no problem with portraying our economies current state. War debts plagued the early United States just as the national deficit does today. After reading the vague philosophies of the Tea Party and Anti-Federalist movements I've concluded that a rise in negative media corresponds with Anti-Federalism in one form or another. Events such as Shays' rebellion, a national deficit, and tensions between larger and smaller along with Northern and Southern states undoubtedly were extremely popular topics for pamphlets and orations throughout the early United States. The stock market meltdown of 2008, the Iraq and Afghanistan war, and corruption among our leaders are the modern day equivalent of those early plights, transmitted through a different medium. Media in both times seem to give off an aura of, "the end is near." Would you agree with me that negative portrayals in the media have correlated with the rise in Anti-Federalism in the United States since the beginning? If so do you think its reasonable that media should have such a profound effect on the politics of our nation? This country was founded on beliefs of Anti-Federalism against the tyranny of Great Britain but how much of that Anti-Federalism stemmed from early propaganda and the fourth estate in general?

1 comment:

  1. Alex,

    Your post has another implication, it seems to me: that times of turmoil tend to bring out the "small government" strain in American history. Do you think that's true? And if so why? Why would the response to "things are bad" be "let's attack the government"?

    ReplyDelete